Skip to content

Know Your Rights

Can Police Search My Phone?

Your phone holds your life. The Supreme Court has said police generally need a warrant to search it.

Published October 6, 2026

Last reviewed October 6, 2026.

The rule: get a warrant

In Riley v. California (2014), the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that police generally need a warrant to search the digital contents of a cell phone, even after an arrest. The Court said phones hold "the privacies of life," far more than anything in a wallet or pocket.

Exceptions

  • Consent. If you agree, police can search. You can say, "I do not consent to a search of my phone."
  • True emergencies (exigent circumstances), such as an imminent threat. These are narrow.
  • Border searches follow different, looser rules at international borders and airports.

Taking your phone vs. searching it

Police may sometimes seize a phone while they seek a warrant, for example if they believe it holds evidence of a crime. Seizing it is not the same as being allowed to look through it.

Practical tips

  • Use a strong passcode. Some courts treat a forced fingerprint or face unlock differently from a passcode.
  • Turn on automatic cloud backup so videos survive if a phone is taken.
  • If you are recording police, a livestream or auto-upload app protects your footage.
  • Do not physically resist if an officer takes your phone. Say you do not consent, and challenge it later.

CopFax is not a law firm and this is not legal advice.

Frequently asked questions

Can police search my phone without a warrant?
Generally no. In Riley v. California (2014), the Supreme Court held police usually need a warrant to search a cell phone's contents, with narrow exceptions like consent or emergencies.
Can police take my phone if I am recording them?
They may not search it without a warrant or consent. Seizing a phone requires a lawful basis, and courts have criticized seizures meant to stop recording.